FOE Action tells McCain, "No more pork for corporate polluters!"

Friends of the Earth Action president, Dr. Brent Blackwalder, calls out McCain:

You know how self righteous John McCain can be when he talks about corporate pork and earmarks, but do you know why he opposes the Lieberman-Warner global warming bill?  He plans to vote against it not because it could lavish $1 trillion on the profitable oil, gas and coal industries, but because he wants to add hundreds of billions of dollars more in earmarks for the nuclear industry!  

Yeah, what a maverick.

"Senator McCain throughout the campaign has been trying to make it seem like he's a moderate on the environment," said Friends of the Earth spokesman Nick Berning.  "But his actions haven't been consistent with his rhetoric.  We're going right after that image to put pressure on him, because we do want him to be a maverick on the environment."

FOE Action has a new television ad running nationwide on CNN.  Let's help out FOE Action and start smacking McCain around a little, instead of each other.

But while the Democratic candidates are too distracted to knock back a rising McCain, several liberal advocacy organizations have begun stepping into the void.

One new TV spot (subscription) that debuted today on national cable news, from environmental group Friends of the Earth, goes straight for one of McCain's bedrock political strengths: the perception of him as a "maverick" candidate. "If you think John McCain opposes pork barrel spending, think again," an announcer says, accusing the Arizona senator of supporting an environmental bill that "gives a trillion dollars to corporate polluters."

Although the group is holding the fire to McCain, its real objective is to defeat the Lieberman-Warner energy bill mentioned in the ad, Benning said.

National Journal Ad Spotlight

You may not know much about the Corporate Polluter Giveaway Bill. I wrote about it last fall:

Edwards Opposes Lieberman-Warner Polluter Giveaway

John Edwards announced his support for fixing or ditching the Bill in November 2007:

"Global warming is a crisis.  Every month, the evidence mounts that decisive action is urgently needed.  At long last, global warming legislation is moving in the Senate.  

"But we cannot be limited in our approach by the armies of lobbyists from big oil companies and other special interests. The critical question is simple: are we going to do everything climate science says is needed to save our planet? The Lieberman-Warner bill says no.  Worst of all, it gives away pollution permits to industry for free - a massive corporate windfall - instead of doing what is right and selling them so that we can use these resources to invest in clean energy research and help regular families go green."

Clinton and Obama also:

The good news is that we already have some key allies: the Democratic presidential candidates. They both have plans that make polluters pay for emissions and that seek the carbon reductions called for by science.

We think the Senate needs to build on these plans rather than the weak Lieberman-Warner bill, which is modeled on legislation by Senator John McCain.

Tell Senators that any global warming legislation should do two simple things:

1.   Support a 100 percent auction of carbon permits and get rid of the obscene giveaways to polluters -- polluters must pay.

2.   Ensure that global warming pollution is reduced to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050, as called for by leading scientists.

While these criteria may seem obvious, the current Senate legislation doesn't meet them. Let's change that.

FIX or DITCH the Lieberman-Warner Global Warming Bill

For its massive industry handouts, it asks too little in return.

After years of ignoring global warming, the U.S. Senate is finally considering legislation to cap greenhouse gas pollution.  Unfortunately, the Lieberman-Warner bill being advanced by Senate Democrats lavishes up to $1 trillion on industries responsible for global warming, and in return asks for reduction targets well below what scientists say are necessary.  If this is the best Senate Democrats can do, the world is in trouble.
Friends of the Earth Action is leading the fight to either fix, or ditch, Lieberman-Warner,

More from FoE Action:

"The Lieberman-Warner bill will reward corporate polluters by handing them pollution permits worth almost half a trillion dollars," said Friends of the Earth's Erich Pica, one of the authors of the analysis. "And that's just one part of this bill. The bill also includes hundreds of billions of dollars of other mind-boggling giveaways.  The levels of pollution-rewarding giveaways in this bill are truly obscene."

In particular, Friends of the Earth's analysis found that the bill:

* Provides the coal industry and other fossil fuel industries pollution permits worth $436 billion over the life of the legislation; 58 percent of this amount goes to coal

* Returns revenue raised through auctions directly to polluters -- for example, an additional $324 billion would subsidize the coal industry's efforts to develop carbon capture and storage mechanisms

* Directs another $522 billion of auction revenue to low or zero-emissions technologies, which could result in handouts to the nuclear power, big hydro and coal industries, which are not clean (these funds could also be directed toward important clean technologies, such as wind and solar -- the legislation is not specific)

snip

"The polluter giveaways are one of several major flaws in this bill," Pica said.

FoE Action:  Lieberman-Warner polluter giveaways 'obscene'

More details here:

Fact Sheet on The Lieberman-Warner Global Warming Bill

FOE Action Presidendt Brent Blackwelder said yesterday:

I am writing you about a new twist in our campaign.  Up to now we've been putting pressure on Senate Democrats to demand better global warming legislation.  But one senator's outrageous take on this bill demands some special heat -- Senator John McCain's.

You know how self righteous John McCain can be when he talks about corporate pork and earmarks, but do you know why he opposes the Lieberman-Warner global warming bill?  He plans to vote against it not because it could lavish $1 trillion on the profitable oil, gas and coal industries, but because he wants to add hundreds of billions of dollars more in earmarks for the nuclear industry!  

Yeah, what a maverick.

We figured it was time to call out McCain's hypocrisy with a national television spot, already airing nationwide on CNN.

We would like keep the pressure on McCain with this ad until the June vote on the Lieberman-Warner bill (formerly the McCain-Lieberman bill, by the way).  Will you help us?

Many thanks,
Brent Blackwelder
President, Friends of the Earth Action

Keep the ad running hard by donating here:

McCain ad

http://action.foe.org/content.jsp?conten t_KEY=4059&t=Lieberman_Warner.dwt

Let's start putting pressure on John McCain.  The world simply cannot afford a McCain presidency.



Display:


"No more pork for corporate polluters!" (2.00 / 4)

Tme to expose McCain as the king of polluter pork!


by TomP on Wed Apr 23, 2008 at 09:39:01 PM EST

"No more pork for corporate polluters!" (2.00 / 2)

More of the McSame---corporate pork!

Good on Friends of the Earth for their work.


by NCDemAmy on Wed Apr 23, 2008 at 10:25:47 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: (2.00 / 1)

he is a republican through and through and its just sad when democrats on either side say they will vote for him.

I can see no substantive reason why anyone who is supporting Obama or Clinton now, could so easily switch to this man.

shurgs


Congratulations to Barack Obama, the presumptive Presumptive Democratic Nominee
by TruthMatters on Wed Apr 23, 2008 at 09:56:28 PM EST

no one cares about McCain. (none / 0)

everyone who has started an anti-mccain diary will soon realize most people don't care

hell 1/3 of the "democrats" here are voting for the man if they don't get their way.

there is no substance or issues here, its one big I hate you no I hate you.

I seriously wish we had a stronger 3rd party in this country.


Congratulations to Barack Obama, the presumptive Presumptive Democratic Nominee
by TruthMatters on Wed Apr 23, 2008 at 10:07:12 PM EST

Hey in your state (none / 0)

and mine we had a thriving 3rd party.  Don't wish that ill upon the nation.


Student Guy=JoeMentum. No really Student Guy=JoeMentum, after all JoeMentum was an embarrassment so is Student Guy. This sig is FAIL!!
by Student Guy on Wed Apr 23, 2008 at 10:29:51 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Hey in your state (none / 0)

heh seriously just change the candidates and what are we doing here thats any different then republicans?


Congratulations to Barack Obama, the presumptive Presumptive Democratic Nominee
by TruthMatters on Wed Apr 23, 2008 at 10:33:22 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I am talking about the (none / 0)

Independence Party which has put T-Paw into office.  Is it worth having a third party when they cause stuff like that.


Student Guy=JoeMentum. No really Student Guy=JoeMentum, after all JoeMentum was an embarrassment so is Student Guy. This sig is FAIL!!
by Student Guy on Thu Apr 24, 2008 at 01:18:08 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Great diary! Thank you! (2.00 / 1)

I was so excited the first time I saw the FOE Action ad on CNN. We definitely need to keep it on the air. I should be able to give at least $25 by friday.
Even John McCain lusts after teh engels.
by sricki on Wed Apr 23, 2008 at 11:26:13 PM EST

McCain is an idiot. (2.00 / 1)

His definition of "earmark" flops and flips all over the place.


John McCain on social security.
by heresjohnny on Wed Apr 23, 2008 at 11:42:35 PM EST

WOW Look who CoSponsored this Bill, (2.00 / 1)

how surprising.

Sen Cardin, Benjamin L. [MD] - 10/18/2007
Sen Casey, Robert P., Jr. [PA] - 10/18/2007
Sen Coleman, Norm [MN] - 10/18/2007
Sen Collins, Susan M. [ME] - 10/18/2007
Sen Dole, Elizabeth [NC] - 10/18/2007
Sen Harkin, Tom [IA] - 10/18/2007
Sen Klobuchar, Amy [MN] - 10/18/2007
Sen Nelson, Bill [FL] - 10/30/2007
Sen Schumer, Charles E. [NY] - 2/28/2008
Sen Warner, John [VA] - 10/18/2007
Sen Wyden, Ron [OR] - 12/17/2007

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/F?c1 10:1:.temp~c110WKcxrK:e1002:

He's been pushing this Bill for so long.  Originally receiving support you would be surprised at then too.  I called it the Nuke Bill.

This was introduced again just Oct 2007

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/F?c1 10:1:.temp~c110WKcxrK:e1002:


by LindaSFNM on Wed Apr 23, 2008 at 11:51:49 PM EST

isn't he supposed to be anti-pork? (2.00 / 1)

it's his cause. great diary tom!


Fight for Democrats in Congress.
by owl06 on Thu Apr 24, 2008 at 12:32:19 AM EST

Re: isn't he supposed to be anti-pork? (2.00 / 1)

Yep, he's "anti-pork" in the same way he's a "maverick". One is code for the biggest pig at the trough and the other is code for "I'll do anything Georgie tells me to do".


Yes, I am a Clintonista for Obama.
by Denny Crane on Thu Apr 24, 2008 at 12:50:40 AM EST
[ Parent ]


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.